Camera Armor

Protect your camera.
Author: Henrik Paul
Published: 02.07.2007
Manufacturer: Camera Armor
Product Group: Digital Cameras
In English In English
Suomeksi Suomeksi

Lens Armor

Before wrapping this up, I mentioned earlier that Camera Armor comes bundled with a Lens Armor. It's made of the same rubber material as the Camera Armor, bendy and flexible. It's meant to be used in the same fashion as a lens hood, and is meant to do to your lens what the Camera Armor does to your body. It's a stretch-and-fit attachment, so it kind of oddly just stays squeezed around your lens. It even comes with a little Lens Cap Leash, which has an adhesive bit at the end, so you could stick your font lens cover on it and avoid misplacing it. I haven't done this, in the fear of having the lens cover there permanently, which I don't want to do. It might also be a non-permanent adhesive, but there's no way for me to know this, and I rather not take the chance. The way the Lens Armor is meant to do its job, I imagine, is to dampen hits taken to the lens, but that functionality is again a bit less than meets the eye.

First of all, the Lens Armor is also made of flexible rubber and is not braced or reinforced in any way, therefore has no stopping power in the front-to-back direction - I can place my hand in front of the Lens Armor and just easily tap it backwards, and the thing yields without effort. Made Products claimed this to be a feature, though, so that you could pull the hood back to reduce possible vignetting. It would soften blows from the side somewhat, though. I would imagine that the most-often-included rigorous lens hoods on Nikkor lenses might do a better job in physically protecting the lens, while giving a perfect protection from stray light. They are attached somewhat similarly (around the front lens element), with the exception that they have stopping power in the front and they snap securely to place and stay there. On the other hand, the Lens Armor is elastic, probably doing a better job at dampening blunt blows. Also the Lens Armor has a fairly small fitting hole (e.g. it was ok for a 50mm/1.8 Nikkor), the Nikon lens hoods come dedicated to each lens. Also, when attached to the 50mm/1.8 Nikkor, the lens having a rotating focusing ring, the Lens Armor actually would prohibit it from rotating if placed too far forwards, therefore making possible damage to the lens and/or camera. Or, if I would pull the Lens Armor backwards so that it would not rest on the focusing ring, it would be difficult to manually focus the lens, would I have the need to do that, because the focusing ring is obscured by the Lens Armor's hood.


  • Price
  • LCD cover
  • Good protection

  • CONS 
  • Wheel slits
  • Markings on the buttons

    In practice, at least the Nikon D200 implementation was not as good as I wanted it to be. The armor made my camera notably more clumsy to operate. In hasty situations, this could mean a missed shot, and to many that is unacceptable. If you are able to shoot with the same settings during your whole shoot, then the camera armor doesn't get in your way. But that most probably means you are shooting in a controlled environment anyhow, thus not placing your camera in much physical danger. Additionally, the pro bodies from Nikon and Canon are made to begin with to endure blows in moderation. Unless used as an hammer (although rumors say some bodies could double as one), they should last. So, could the target audience be on the lower end of the camera market? They have less buttons to operate, therefore the outer skin would get less in the way of shooting. Individuals with relatively little knowledge of photographing might adjust their settings a lot less in general. The less expensive SLR:s are also mostly made out of plastic, therefore a removable exoskeleton would be very much justified.

    Despite the criticism I have dealt the Camera Armor in this article, I think it's only fair to say that this all should be put in a broader perspective than my personal usage. The Camera Armor, Lens Armor and an extra LCD-cover costs a total of only a few tens of euros/dollars. Even if you wouldn't use the Armor constantly and permanently, you could buy it for the spare display cover, and keep the armor in store for that day you know you will be hiking in thickets or jumping in ditches. For me, however, the deal breakers are the loss battery grip and the hard accessibility of certain controls. I feel, however, that these are design problems that aren't impossible to overcome. Thin out the materials around some dials, reshape it a bit here and there, and Made Product would have a killer accessory. But like this, I really can't see myself using it too much with my camera.

    Questions or comments? Visit MetkuMods forum.

    Additional Information

    Camera Armor

    Past related articles in MetkuMods

    Canon EFS to EF

    Concord Eye-Q 5330z

    Corsair Survivor

    Pages:  1 2 3 

      Content in english!
      Sisältö suomeksi!


     .:Back to top Bandwidth by Mpoli

    Copyright ©, All Rights Reserved.
    All content and graphics in MetkuMods are sole property of Jani Pönkkö and may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without written permission from him.
    All brand names, trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners.Privacy Policy